Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X offers a gear ratio of 5.0:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.47 out of 10 (102 centimeter / 40.16 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI
