Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
70.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC 5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/175
Conclusion
Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX edges out Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (105 centimeter / 41.34 inch). Still, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 220g / 7,76oz and a ergonomics of 6.27 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Shimano Sahara FJ?
Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 10 out of 10 (105 centimeter / 41.34 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX
