Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
88.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and total score (8.85 out of 10). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.14 out of 10 (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 2000X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC
