Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
63.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/240

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX
