Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
63.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/240

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and the durability (5.89 out of 10). Still, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a weight of 250g / 8,82oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
