Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
52.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/240

Shimano Ocea Conquest HG
Seafishing
201x
66.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €477.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/200
Conclusion
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X edges out Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (78 centimeter / 30.71 inch). Still, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a gear ratio of 5.0:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Shimano Ocea Conquest HG?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX
