Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
68.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the total score (7.96 out of 10). Still, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a weight of 255g / 8,99oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.3 out of 10 (255g / 8,99oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H
