Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Nexave FI  , 3000, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, NEXC3000FI
Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
57.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €41.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P, left and right hand, Surfcasting Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10711-455
Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P
Seafishing
79.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.7 out of 10
Ergonomics5.61 out of 10
Gear ratio4.1:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight555g / 19.58oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSeafishing
  • Price range~ €209.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size-
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300

Conclusion

Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch) and total score (7.96 out of 10). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P?

There are not much differences between the two comparables