Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
57.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340
Conclusion
Both Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X and Delphin SHARX 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X offers a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs, while Delphin SHARX 4000X stands out for a durability of 7 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Delphin SHARX?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X
- With a great drag score 9.2 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX
