Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
57.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.73 out of 10) and the total score (7.38 out of 10). Still, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 255g / 8,99oz and a ball bearings of 4, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.3 out of 10 (255g / 8,99oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Torium 20HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX
