Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
57.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.15 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight255g / 8.99oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
89.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1 / 1:1
Maximum drag40kg / 88.18lbs
Weight4935g / 174.08oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,099.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size130A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano Tiagra 130AX clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and line retrieve per crank (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tiagra 130AX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Shimano Tiagra?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.3 out of 10 (255g / 8,99oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Tiagra 130AX
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX
