Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
59.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.91 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.73 out of 10) and the total score (7.38 out of 10). Still, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.8:1 and a line retrieve per crank of 93 centimeter / 36.61 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX
