Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX

Shimano 21 Nexave FI

Spinning

54.80 out of 100

Value for money3 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.91 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs

Weight305g / 10.76oz

Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €44.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT

Spinning

80.00 out of 100

Value for money4 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.66 out of 10

Ergonomics6.42 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs

Weight175g / 6.17oz

Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €199.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size2000 S-H
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X, offering significantly better performance in weight (175g / 6,17oz) and total score (8 out of 10). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.