Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Nexave FI  , 5000 HG, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, NEXC5000HGFI
Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
60.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.91 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €44.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size5000 HG
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/175
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD, 4012, left and right hand, Match and Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10215-412
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €199.00
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4012
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX, offering significantly better performance in total score (9.11 out of 10) and ball bearings (8). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?

There are not much differences between the two comparables