Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X

Shimano 21 Nexave FI  , 5000 HG, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, NEXC5000HGFI
Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
60.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.91 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €44.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size5000 HG
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/175
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW, 2500, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, bespult, Front Drag, 10006-250
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW
Spinning
2500x
62.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €59.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 98 centimeter / 38.58 inch, while Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X stands out for a weight of 230g / 8,11oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano 21 Nexave FI and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW?

There are not much differences between the two comparables