Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Sahara FJ, 2500SHGFJ, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, SH2500SHGFJ
Shimano 21 Sahara FJ
Spinning
64.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank91 centimeter / 35.83 inch
Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €63.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500SHGFJ
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/120
Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P, left and right hand, Surfcasting Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10711-455
Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P
Seafishing
79.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.7 out of 10
Ergonomics5.61 out of 10
Gear ratio4.1:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight555g / 19.58oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSeafishing
  • Price range~ €209.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size-
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300

Conclusion

Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P edges out Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and the total score (7.96 out of 10). Still, Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a ergonomics of 6.2 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano 21 Sahara FJ and Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P?

There are not much differences between the two comparables