Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Stradic SW, 5000 PG, left and right hand, Saltwater Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 20STSW5000PG
Shimano 21 Stradic SW
Seafishing
85.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.8 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank78 centimeter / 30.71 inch
Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSeafishing
  • Price range~ €240.40
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size5000 PG
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/200
Shimano Sahara FJ, C 5000 XG, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, SHC5000XGFJ
Shimano Sahara FJ
Spinning
70.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €74.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC 5000 XG
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/175

Conclusion

Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX edges out Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (430g / 15,17oz) and the durability (8.8 out of 10). Still, Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 11kg / 24,25lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 105 centimeter / 41.34 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano 21 Stradic SW and Shimano Sahara FJ?

There are not much differences between the two comparables