Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Stradic SW

Seafishing

80.40 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability9.5 out of 10

Ergonomics5.77 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight440g / 15.52oz

Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch

Ball bearings7

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSeafishing
Price range~ €267.10
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size6000 XG
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/190

Shimano Sahara 1000 R

Spinning

36.20 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.94 out of 10

Ergonomics4.15 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs

Weight255g / 9.00oz

Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch

Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €46.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size1000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeRead drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/170. 0.20/140, 0.25/90

Conclusion

Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 1000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.04 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 1000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Shimano 21 Stradic SW and Shimano Sahara 1000 R?

Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX

At 5.82 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.