Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Stradic SW
Seafishing
80.40 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.77 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €267.10
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/190

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (8.04 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Stradic SW and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX
- At 5.82 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the drag is on the lighter side—suitable for smaller saltwater species or finesse-style presentations
- Scoring 8.74 out of 10 (440g / 15,52oz), this reel is lighter than expected for a saltwater model, which helps on long sessions without extra strain
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Shimano TLD 25X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX


Shimano TLD 25X vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-PX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-HX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 10000-PX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 20000-HX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX
