Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Shimano 21 Sustain
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio6:0:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €209.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000 HGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 130/1.3
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX offers a weight of 210g / 7,41oz, while Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Sustain and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX
Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Delphin RAYA body
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X
Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX
Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX
Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX
Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X
Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X