Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 Sustain
Spinning
94.80 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5:8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 180/1.8

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX offers a weight of 275g / 9,7oz, while Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Sustain and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
