Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Shimano 21 Sustain
Spinning
94.80 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.08 out of 10
Gear ratio5:8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight275g / 9.7oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €215.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HGFJ
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 180/1.8

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and weight (275g / 9,7oz). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 Sustain and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5:8:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.17 out of 10 (275g / 9,7oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000D-CX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX
