Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
74.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.46 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight655g / 23.1oz
Line retireve per crank116 centimeter / 45.67 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €429.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size10000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/210

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
89.70 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX edges out Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the gear ratio (5.2:1). Still, Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 HGX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 9.5 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD vs Shimano Spheros SW A 20000 PGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 2000 SS-PX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 8000-HX
