Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.46 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight655g / 23.1oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €429.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size10000 PG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/210

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.58 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €175.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa BG MQ 6000D-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 10000 PGX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
