Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
76.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.46 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight660g / 23.28oz
Line retireve per crank134 centimeter / 52.76 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €429.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size14000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/240

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Both Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX and Penn FIERCE IV 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX offers a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, while Penn FIERCE IV 2500X stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano TLD 20X vs Shimano TLD 15X


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 18000-HX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX


Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000PGX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano TLD 15X vs Shimano Spheros SW SPC3000HGSWX
