Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
76.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.46 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight660g / 23.28oz
Line retireve per crank134 centimeter / 52.76 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €429.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size14000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/240

Penn Sargus II Spinning
Spinning
2500x
64.80 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX edges out Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.65 out of 10). Still, Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.5:1 and a ball bearings of 5, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C and Penn Sargus II Spinning?
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.6 out of 10 (5.5:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Shimano TLD 25X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 4000D-XHX


Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
