Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
76.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.46 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight660g / 23.28oz
Line retireve per crank134 centimeter / 52.76 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €429.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size14000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/240

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX
- With a drag score of 10 out of 10 (25kg / 55,12lbs), the reel is built to handle serious pressure from large saltwater predators
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- Thanks to its 6.33 out of 10 (5.0:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD 25X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X vs Shimano TLD 25X


Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag vs Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 5000-HX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX


Shimano TLD 25X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX


Delphin INKS 2000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag
