Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
81.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight420g / 14.82oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €385.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX offers a line retrieve per crank of 97 centimeter / 38.19 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX
- With a fast retrieve 97 centimeter / 38.19 inch, the reel helps you stay on top of fast runs and cover water efficiently
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Delphin YUPIE


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 10000-HX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 5000-XHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 8000PGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 10000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X
