Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
81.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight420g / 14.82oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €385.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
63.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX edges out Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (97 centimeter / 38.19 inch). Still, Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.3:1 and a ball bearings of 4, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C and Daiwa Ninja LT?
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 HGX
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX


Daiwa 24 Certate SW 4000-XHX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX


Shimano Beastmaster 12000 MD vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Spheros SW A 6000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Stradic SWB 4000XGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Ocea Conquest HG 201X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000HGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX
