Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
69.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.8 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight420g / 14.82oz
Line retireve per crank105 centimeter / 41.34 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €435.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Both Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX and Penn FIERCE IV 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Penn FIERCE IV 2500X stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 20000 PGX


Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 20000 PGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 PGX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX


Daiwa BG MQ 8000-HX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X
