Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
69.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €435.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/190

Penn FIERCE IV
Spinning
68.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.07 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.5kg / 12,13lbs
Weight280g / 9.88oz
Line retireve per crank84 centimeter / 33.07 inch
Ball bearings4+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €65.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/235
Conclusion
Both Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX and Penn FIERCE IV 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 HGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Penn FIERCE IV 2500X stands out for a gear ratio of 6.2:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C and Penn FIERCE IV?
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- 7 out of 10 (84 centimeter / 33.07 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano TLD 20X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano TLD 20X


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Stradic SWB 8000HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 20000 PGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 10000-HX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Stradic SWB 10000HGX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Shimano TLD 15X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
