Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
70.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €435.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/190

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX clearly outshines Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and ball bearings (6). While Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- 8.2 out of 10 (87 centimeter / 34.25 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 5000 PGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-HX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 8000-HX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 10000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX
