Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
70.10 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €435.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000 XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/190

Daiwa Fuego LT
Spinning
3000d-cx
66.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €77.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX and Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX offers a durability of 9.5 out of 10, while Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C and Daiwa Fuego LT?
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 6000 XGX
- Built tough for the salt, ideal for seafishing.
Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Battle III 3000X vs Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Shimano Spheros SW A 5000 XGX vs Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF


Shimano Spheros SW SP4000XGSWX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 8000-PX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX
