Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C
Seafishing
74.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.52 out of 10
Gear ratio5.6:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight615g / 21.69oz
Line retireve per crank107 centimeter / 42.13 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €429.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/230

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
85.50 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank76 centimeter / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000S-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX edges out Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.8:1) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs and a durability of 9.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76 centimeter / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF vs Shimano TLD 25X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano TLD 15X vs Daiwa 24 Certate SW 6000-XHX


Shimano Stradic SWB 6000XGX vs Shimano TLD 25X


Daiwa 21 Certate SW (G) 5000-XHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Shimano 2020 Saragosa SW A 5000 XGX vs Shimano TLD 25X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X
