Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano 21 TwinPower SW
Seafishing
88.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.79 out of 10
Gear ratio4:6:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight425g / 14.99oz
Line retireve per crank83 centimeter / 32.68 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €435.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 190/0.19

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
79.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €159.80
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X offers a line retrieve per crank of 83 centimeter / 32.68 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano 21 TwinPower SW and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Shimano 21 TwinPower SW 6000X
- A line retrieval (per crank) of 83 centimeter / 32.68 inch helps bringing in line quickly, making it great for repositioning or working topwater baits
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano Spheros SW A 20000 PGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano TLD 25X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Shimano TLD 25X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano TLD 25X vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa 23 Caldia SW 6000D-HX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 4000 XGX


Shimano Spheros SW A 14000 XGX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 14000 XGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X
