Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.68 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight159g / 5.61oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €85.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/270
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR 4000X clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and ball bearings (5+1). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR 4000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With a line retrieve of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch (5.71 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin FRIZ


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
