Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Both Shimano AERO XR 4000X and Penn Battle III 8000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR 4000X offers a weight of 245g / 8,64oz, while Penn Battle III 8000 HSX stands out for a durability of 8.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Penn Battle III?
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- Rated 8.6 out of 10 (245g / 8,64oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- With a line retrieve of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch (5.71 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX
