Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR, C3000, left and right hand, Feeder fishing reel, Front Drag, AEROXRC3000
Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €114.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC3000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT, 4000D-C, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10610-400
Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT
Spinning
84.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.65 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €195.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000D-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Conclusion

Both Shimano AERO XR C3000X and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR C3000X offers a weight of 210g / 7,41oz, while Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables