Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR, C3000, left and right hand, Feeder fishing reel, Front Drag, AEROXRC3000
Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €114.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC3000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT, 2000 S-XH, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, Front Drag, 10308-200
Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT
Spinning
63.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €79.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2000 S-XH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Shimano AERO XR C3000X edges out Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and the total score (8.1 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a line retrieve per crank of 81 centimeter / 31.89 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables