Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C3000X edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (5+1) and the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.59 out of 10 and a ergonomics of 6.33 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- With a line retrieve of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch (5.43 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Delphin HORNET 60X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Delphin HORNET 60X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
