Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR

Feeder And Match

81.00 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability4.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.2 out of 10

Gear ratio5

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight210g / 7.41oz

Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch

Ball bearings5+1

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelFeeder and match
Price range~ €114.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Penn FIERCE IV

Spinning

65.80 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability7 out of 10

Ergonomics4 out of 10

Gear ratio6.2:1

Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs

Weight335g / 11.82oz

Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch

Ball bearings4+1

Technical Specifications

BrandPENN
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €69.00
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel size3000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/180

Conclusion

Shimano AERO XR C3000X edges out Penn FIERCE IV 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the weight (210g / 7,41oz) and the ergonomics (6.2 out of 10). Still, Penn FIERCE IV 3000X holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 89 centimeter / 35.04 inch and a durability of 7 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.