Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Both Shimano AERO XR C3000X and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR C3000X offers a weight of 210g / 7,41oz, while Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 88 centimeter / 34.65 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- Rated 8.8 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
