Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €114.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C3000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and total score (8.1 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Shimano AERO XR C3000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (9kg / 19,84lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.8 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Delphin INKS 4000X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
