Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Delphin BRONZ
Spinning
34.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight346g / 12.2oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings2
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/350
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X clearly outshines Delphin BRONZ 6000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin BRONZ 6000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C5000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Delphin BRONZ?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX
