Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
47.50 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight313g / 11.04oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/315
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C5000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X
