Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Delphin IXCELA AL BODY
Spinning
45.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight334g / 11.78oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €59.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.22/440
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X clearly outshines Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and line retrieve per crank (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch). While Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C5000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Delphin IXCELA AL BODY?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX
