Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and ball bearings (5+1). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano AERO XR C5000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX
