Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Penn International VISW
Multireels
64.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.98 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1/1.5:1
Maximum drag29.4kg / 64,82lbs
Weight3205g / 113.05oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €979.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size80
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.76/1435
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR C5000X edges out Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs) and the weight (250g / 8,82oz). Still, Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch and a durability of 5.98 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Penn International VISW?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (11kg / 24,25lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Delphin REDIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
