Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Both Shimano AERO XR C5000X and Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR C5000X offers a ball bearings of 5+1, while Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX stands out for a gear ratio of 5.3:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Penn Slammer IV?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- Rated 8.57 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
