Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
79.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/120

Shimano Vanquish FC
Spinning
84.10 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €407.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano AERO XR C5000X and Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Shimano AERO XR C5000X offers a ball bearings of 5+1, while Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Shimano AERO XR and Shimano Vanquish FC?
Shimano AERO XR C5000X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Delphin REDIX


Delphin RAYA body vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Delphin REDIX
